Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey E. G. Campbell, Clarridge, B. R., Gokhale, M., Birenbaum, L., Hilgartner, S., Holtzman, N. A., and Blumenthal, D., “Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey”, JAMA, vol. 287, no. 4, pp. 473-80, 2002. Read more about Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national surveyGoogle ScholarDOIBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting M. L. Callaham, Wears, R. L., Weber, E. J., Barton, C., and Young, G., “Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting”, Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, pp. 254-257, 1998. Read more about Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meetingGoogle ScholarBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
Withholding research results in academic life science : Evidence from a national survey of faculty. D. Blumenthal, Campbell, E. G., Anderson, M. S., Causino, N., and Louis, K. S., “Withholding research results in academic life science : Evidence from a national survey of faculty.”, JAMA, vol. 277, no. 15, pp. 1224-8, 1997. Read more about Withholding research results in academic life science : Evidence from a national survey of faculty.Google ScholarDOIBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials S. Al-Marzouki, Evans, S., Marshall, T., and Roberts, I., “Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials”, BMJ: British Medical Journal, vol. 331, no. 7511, pp. 267-270, 2005. Read more about Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trialsGoogle ScholarDOIBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry A. Abbott and Schwarz, J., “Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry”, Nature, vol. 418, no. 6894, p. 113, 2002. Read more about Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiryGoogle ScholarDOIBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
Researcher suspended for falsifying data “Researcher suspended for falsifying data”, Nature, vol. 453, no. 7198, pp. 969-969, 2008. Read more about Researcher suspended for falsifying dataGoogle ScholarDOIBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
Internet Research Ethics Library E. A. Buchanan and Ess, C., “Internet Research Ethics Library”. 2010. Read more about Internet Research Ethics LibraryGoogle ScholarBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
e-research ethics A. Carusi, Beaulieu, A., and Tatum, C., “e-research ethics”. Oxford University, Directorate for Digital Social Research , 2010. Read more about e-research ethicsGoogle ScholarBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
Data withholding and the next generation of scientists: results of a national survey. C. Vogeli, Yucel, R., Bendavid, E., Jones, L. M., Anderson, M. S., Louis, K. S., and Campbell, E. G., “Data withholding and the next generation of scientists: results of a national survey.”, Academic Medicine, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 128-36, 2006. Read more about Data withholding and the next generation of scientists: results of a national survey.Google ScholarBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
Falsification Charge Highlights Image-Manipulation Standards G. Vogel, “Falsification Charge Highlights Image-Manipulation Standards”, Science, vol. 322, no. 5900, pp. 356-356, 2008. Read more about Falsification Charge Highlights Image-Manipulation StandardsGoogle ScholarDOIBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS