Social Sciences

Structuring Case-Based Ethics Training: How Comparing Cases and Structured Prompts Influence Training Effectiveness

L. N. Harkrider, MacDougall, A. E., and Bagdasarov, Z. (et al.), “Structuring Case-Based Ethics Training: How Comparing Cases and Structured Prompts Influence Training Effectiveness”, Ethics and Behavior, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 179 - 198, 2013.

Improving Ethical Knowledge and Sensemaking from Cases through Elaborative Interrogation and Outcome Valence

J. F. Johnson, Bagdasarov, Z., and MacDougall, A. E., “Improving Ethical Knowledge and Sensemaking from Cases through Elaborative Interrogation and Outcome Valence”, Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 265 - 299, 2014.

Disastrous Publics: Counter-enactments in Participatory Experiments

M. Tironi, “Disastrous Publics: Counter-enactments in Participatory Experiments”, Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 564-587, 2015.

Gender and Clarity of Evaluation among Academic Scientists in Research Universities

M. Frank Fox, “Gender and Clarity of Evaluation among Academic Scientists in Research Universities”, Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 487-515, 2015.

No One Likes a Snitch

B. Redman and Caplan, A., “No One Likes a Snitch”, Science & Engineering Ethics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 813-819, 2015.

Does the Cover Letter Really Matter?

K. Moustafa, “Does the Cover Letter Really Matter?”, Science & Engineering Ethics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 839-841, 2015.

An Explanation of Resisted Discoveries Based on Construal-Level Theory

H. Fang, “An Explanation of Resisted Discoveries Based on Construal-Level Theory”, Science & Engineering Ethics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 41-50, 2015.

Penetrating the Omerta of Predatory Publishing: The Romanian Connection

D. Djuric, “Penetrating the Omerta of Predatory Publishing: The Romanian Connection”, Science & Engineering Ethics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 183-202, 2015.

The Principles of Fair Allocation of Peer-Review: How Much Should a Researcher be Expected to Contribute?

J. Derraik, “The Principles of Fair Allocation of Peer-Review: How Much Should a Researcher be Expected to Contribute?”, Science & Engineering Ethics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 825-828, 2015.

Data Mining and Privacy of Social Network Sites' Users: Implications of the Data Mining Problem

Y. Al-Saggaf and Islam, M., “Data Mining and Privacy of Social Network Sites' Users: Implications of the Data Mining Problem”, Science & Engineering Ethics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 941-966, 2015.

Pages