Sort by

Search results

Displaying 3051 - 1848 of 1848 results.

Advance directives in dementia research: The opinions and arguments of clinical researchers - an empirical study

The Three Rs of Animal Research: What they Mean for the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Why

Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors

Ludwik Fleck: On Medical Experiments on Human Beings : Paradoxical Infrastructures: Ruins, Retrofit, and Risk

Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior in Academic Cheating Research–Cross-Cultural Comparison

The Impact of Unrealistic Optimism on Informed Consent in Early-Phase Oncology Trials

Relevant Information and Informed Consent in Research: In Defense of the Subjective Standard of Disclosure

Aware, Yet Ignorant: Exploring the Views of Early Career Researchers About Funding and Conflicts of Interests in Science

Patients' Awareness About Their Rights: A Study from Coastal South India

Evaluation of Research Ethics Committees: Criteria for the Ethical Quality of the Review Process.

G. Scherzinger and Bobbert, M., Evaluation of Research Ethics Committees: Criteria for the Ethical Quality of the Review Process., Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality Assurance, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 152 - 176, 2017.

Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials

Pages