No One Likes a Snitch B. Redman and Caplan, A., “No One Likes a Snitch”, Science & Engineering Ethics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 813-819, 2015. Read more about No One Likes a SnitchLog in or register to post commentsGoogle ScholarDOIBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
Help from Faculty: Findings from the Acadia Institute Graduate Education Study M. S. Anderson, Oju, E. C., and Falkner, T. M. R., “Help from Faculty: Findings from the Acadia Institute Graduate Education Study”, Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 487-503, 2001. Read more about Help from Faculty: Findings from the Acadia Institute Graduate Education StudyGoogle ScholarDOIBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
Mentally disabled research subjects. The enduring policy issues. R. Dresser, “Mentally disabled research subjects. The enduring policy issues.”, JAMA, vol. 276, no. 1, pp. 67-72, 1996. Read more about Mentally disabled research subjects. The enduring policy issues.Log in or register to post commentsGoogle ScholarBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
Quality and Peer Review of Research: An Adjudicating Role for Editors D. P. Newton, “Quality and Peer Review of Research: An Adjudicating Role for Editors”, Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality Assurance, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 130-145, 2010. Read more about Quality and Peer Review of Research: An Adjudicating Role for EditorsGoogle ScholarDOIBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
Marginalized Populations and Drug Addiction Research: Realism, Mistrust, and Misconception C. B. Fisher, Oransky, M., Mahadevan, M., Singer, M., Mirhej, G., and Hodge, D., “Marginalized Populations and Drug Addiction Research: Realism, Mistrust, and Misconception”, IRB: Ethics & Human Research, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 1-9, 2008. Read more about Marginalized Populations and Drug Addiction Research: Realism, Mistrust, and MisconceptionGoogle ScholarBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
The Ethics of Single Blind Trials P. S. Heckerling, “The Ethics of Single Blind Trials”, IRB: Ethics & Human Research, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 12-16, 2005. Read more about The Ethics of Single Blind TrialsGoogle ScholarBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
Reformed Consent: Adapting to New Media and Research Participant Preferences J. Henry, Palmer, B. W., Palinkas, L., Glorioso, D. K., Caligiuri, M. P., and Jeste, D. V., “Reformed Consent: Adapting to New Media and Research Participant Preferences”, IRB: Ethics & Human Research, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 1-8, 2009. Read more about Reformed Consent: Adapting to New Media and Research Participant PreferencesGoogle ScholarBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
Protecting Third Parties in Human Subjects Research D. B. Resnik and Sharp, R. R., “Protecting Third Parties in Human Subjects Research”, IRB: Ethics & Human Research, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1-7, 2006. Read more about Protecting Third Parties in Human Subjects ResearchGoogle ScholarBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
Supping with a Short Spoon: Suppression Inherent in Research Methodology S. Macdonald and Hellgren, B., “Supping with a Short Spoon: Suppression Inherent in Research Methodology”, Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality Assurance, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 227, 1999. Read more about Supping with a Short Spoon: Suppression Inherent in Research MethodologyGoogle ScholarDOIBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
Fostering a Culture of Scientific Integrity: Legalistic vs. Scientific Virtue-Based Approaches R. Pennock, “Fostering a Culture of Scientific Integrity: Legalistic vs. Scientific Virtue-Based Approaches”, Professional Ethics Report, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1-3, 2015. Read more about Fostering a Culture of Scientific Integrity: Legalistic vs. Scientific Virtue-Based ApproachesLog in or register to post commentsGoogle ScholarDOIBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
The Inalienable Right to Withdraw from Research T. McConnell, “The Inalienable Right to Withdraw from Research”, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 840-846, 2010. Read more about The Inalienable Right to Withdraw from ResearchGoogle ScholarDOIBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
"You May Have Already Won…": An Examination of the Use of Lottery Payments in Research J. S. Brown, Schonfeld, T. L., and Gordon, B. C., “"You May Have Already Won…": An Examination of the Use of Lottery Payments in Research”, IRB: Ethics & Human Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 12-16, 2006. Read more about "You May Have Already Won…": An Examination of the Use of Lottery Payments in ResearchGoogle ScholarBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
Bounty-Hunting and Finder's Fees J. A. Christensen and Orlowski, J. P., “Bounty-Hunting and Finder's Fees”, IRB: Ethics & Human Research, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 16-19, 2005. Read more about Bounty-Hunting and Finder's FeesGoogle ScholarBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
Clinical Research in Low-Literacy Populations: Using Teach-Back to Assess Comprehension of Informed Consent and Privacy Information S. Kripalani, Bengtzen, R., Henderson, L. E., and Jacobson, T. A., “Clinical Research in Low-Literacy Populations: Using Teach-Back to Assess Comprehension of Informed Consent and Privacy Information”, IRB: Ethics & Human Research, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 13-19, 2008. Read more about Clinical Research in Low-Literacy Populations: Using Teach-Back to Assess Comprehension of Informed Consent and Privacy InformationGoogle ScholarBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS
Determining the Costs of Institutional Review Boards J. L. Speckman, Byrne, M. M., Gerson, J., Getz, K., Wangsmo, G., Muse, C. T., and Sugarman, J., “Determining the Costs of Institutional Review Boards”, IRB: Ethics & Human Research, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 7-13, 2007. Read more about Determining the Costs of Institutional Review BoardsGoogle ScholarBibTeXTaggedMARCEndNote XMLRIS