Sort by

Search results

Displaying 1 - 13 of 13 results.

Evaluating Oversight Systems for Emerging Technologies: A Case Study of Genetically Engineered Organisms

J. Kuzma, Najmaie, P., and Larson, J., “Evaluating Oversight Systems for Emerging Technologies: A Case Study of Genetically Engineered Organisms”, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 546-586, 2009.

Attitudes of Agricultural Experts Toward Genetically Modified Crops: A Case Study in Southwest Iran

M. Ghanian, Ghoochani, O., Kitterlin, M., Jahangiry, S., Zarafshani, K., Van Passel, S., and Azadi, H., “Attitudes of Agricultural Experts Toward Genetically Modified Crops: A Case Study in Southwest Iran”, Science & Engineering Ethics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 509-524, 2016.

The Role of Databank Managers As Guardians of Public Interests: Commentary on 'Strategies for Consulting with the Community: The Cases of Four Large-Scale Databanks'

L. N. Geller, “The Role of Databank Managers As Guardians of Public Interests: Commentary on 'Strategies for Consulting with the Community: The Cases of Four Large-Scale Databanks'”, Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 10, pp. 479-480, 2004.

Transforming Genetic Research Practices with Marginalized Communities: A Case for Responsive Justice

S. Goering, Holland, S., and Fryer-Edwards, K., “Transforming Genetic Research Practices with Marginalized Communities: A Case for Responsive Justice”, Hastings Center Report, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 43-53, 2008.

Strategies for Consulting with the Community: The Cases of Four Large-Scale Genetic Databases

B. Godard, Marshall, J., and Laberge, C., “Strategies for Consulting with the Community: The Cases of Four Large-Scale Genetic Databases”, Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 10, pp. 457-477, 2004.

Factors Influencing Stakeholders Attitudes Toward Genetically Modified Aedes Mosquito

L. Amin and Hashim, H., “Factors Influencing Stakeholders Attitudes Toward Genetically Modified Aedes Mosquito”, Science & Engineering Ethics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 655-681, 2015.

The truth about the truth: What matters when privacy and anonymity can no longer be promised to those who participate in clinical trial research?

A. Freeman Cook and Hoas, H., “The truth about the truth: What matters when privacy and anonymity can no longer be promised to those who participate in clinical trial research?”, Research Ethics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 97-108, 2013.

Genetic secrets: Social issues of medical screening in a genetic age

E. Draper, “Genetic secrets: Social issues of medical screening in a genetic age”, Hastings Center Report, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. S15-S18, 1992.

Realigning gene editing with clinical research ethics: What the “CRISPR Twins” debacle means for Chinese and international research ethics governance

E. Kleiderman and Ogbogu, U., “Realigning gene editing with clinical research ethics: What the “CRISPR Twins” debacle means for Chinese and international research ethics governance”, Accountability in Research, vol. 26, no. 4, 2019.

Gone with the Wind: Conceiving of Moral Responsibility in the Case of GMO Contamination

Z. Robaey, “Gone with the Wind: Conceiving of Moral Responsibility in the Case of GMO Contamination”, Science & Engineering Ethics, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 889-906, 2016.

‚Mirroring‘ the Ethics of Biobanking: What Analysis of Consent Documents Can Tell Us?

S. Jurate, Zivile, V., and Eugenijus, G., “‚Mirroring‘ the Ethics of Biobanking: What Analysis of Consent Documents Can Tell Us?”, Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1079 - 1093, 2014.

Beyond Patchwork Precaution in the Dual-Use Governance of Synthetic Biology.

A. Kelle, “Beyond Patchwork Precaution in the Dual-Use Governance of Synthetic Biology.”, Science & Engineering Ethics, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1121 - 1139, 2013.

Debates on Genetically Modified Crops in the Context of Sustainable Development

K. Gerasimova, “Debates on Genetically Modified Crops in the Context of Sustainable Development”, Science & Engineering Ethics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 525-547, 2016.