Sort by

Search results

Displaying 1 - 10 of 10 results.

Moral Reasoning in Scientific Research

M. J. Bebeau, Pimple, K. D., Muskavitch, K. M. T., Borden, S. L., and Smith, D. H., “Moral Reasoning in Scientific Research”. Indiana University, Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions , p. 86 p., 1995.

Research Misconduct in Three Acts

K. D. Pimple, “Research Misconduct in Three Acts”. TeachRCR, 2017.

Implementation of Clinical Ethics Consultation in German Hospitals

M. Schochow, Schnell, D., and Steger, F., “Implementation of Clinical Ethics Consultation in German Hospitals”, Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 985-991, 2019.

The Grammar of Power: The Problem of Moral Objectification in Human Research

R. C. Warren and Gabriele, E. F., “The Grammar of Power: The Problem of Moral Objectification in Human Research”, Journal of Research Administration, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 94-106, 2012.

Understanding of plagiarism among North-African university hospital doctors (UHDs): A pilot study

M. Khemiss, Berrezouga, L., Ben Khelifa, M., Masmoudi, T., and Ben Saad, H., “Understanding of plagiarism among North-African university hospital doctors (UHDs): A pilot study”, Accountability in Research, vol. 26, no. 2, 2019.

San Code of Research Ethics

South African San Institute, “San Code of Research Ethics”. South African San Institute, Kimberly, Northern Cape, South Africa, p. 4 p., 2017.

Key Issues in Conflict of Interest for Scientific, Engineering, and Educational Research

L. Stokes, “Key Issues in Conflict of Interest for Scientific, Engineering, and Educational Research”, Journal of Research Administration, vol. 33, no. 2, p. 19, 2002.

Standards and Operational Guidance for Ethics Review of Health-Related Research with Human Participants

“Standards and Operational Guidance for Ethics Review of Health-Related Research with Human Participants”. World Health Organization, 2011.

Balancing Benefits and Risks of Immortal Data: Participants' Views of Open Consent in the Personal Genome Project

O. A. Zarate, Brody, J. Green, and Brown, P., “Balancing Benefits and Risks of Immortal Data: Participants' Views of Open Consent in the Personal Genome Project”, Hastings Center Report, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 36-45, 2016.

When the research is not reproducible: the importance of author-initiated and institution-driven responses and investigations

B. Luen Tang, “When the research is not reproducible: the importance of author-initiated and institution-driven responses and investigations”, Accountability in Research, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 273-289, 2018.