Institutional Constraints on the Ethics of Expert Testimony B. D. Sales and Simon, L., “Institutional Constraints on the Ethics of Expert Testimony”, Ethics and Behavior, vol. 3, no. 3-4, pp. 231-249, 1993. Read more about Institutional Constraints on the Ethics of Expert TestimonyGoogle ScholarDOIBibTexTaggedMARCXMLRIS
Disentangling Daubert: An Epistemological Study in Theory and Practice S. Haack, “Disentangling Daubert: An Epistemological Study in Theory and Practice”, Journal of Philosophy Science and Law, vol. 5, 2005. Read more about Disentangling Daubert: An Epistemological Study in Theory and PracticeLog in or register to post commentsGoogle ScholarBibTexTaggedMARCXMLRIS
The Evolving Role of Scientific Experts in the Courts M. S. Frankel, “The Evolving Role of Scientific Experts in the Courts ”, Journal of Philosophy Science and Law, vol. 1, 2001. Read more about The Evolving Role of Scientific Experts in the Courts Log in or register to post commentsGoogle ScholarBibTexTaggedMARCXMLRIS
The expert witness, the adversary system, and the voice of reason: Reconciling impartiality and advocacy D. W. Shuman and Greenberg, S. A., “The expert witness, the adversary system, and the voice of reason: Reconciling impartiality and advocacy”, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 219-224, 2003. Read more about The expert witness, the adversary system, and the voice of reason: Reconciling impartiality and advocacyGoogle ScholarDOIBibTexTaggedMARCXMLRIS
Punishing Experts, or Protecting the Courts ? L. Andrew, “Punishing Experts, or Protecting the Courts ?”, Journal of Philosophy Science and Law, vol. 5, 2005. Read more about Punishing Experts, or Protecting the Courts ?Log in or register to post commentsGoogle ScholarBibTexTaggedMARCXMLRIS
Daubert and the Acceptability of Legal Decisions C. F. Cranor, “Daubert and the Acceptability of Legal Decisions”, Journal of Philosophy Science and Law, vol. 5, 2005. Read more about Daubert and the Acceptability of Legal DecisionsLog in or register to post commentsGoogle ScholarBibTexTaggedMARCXMLRIS
Conflicts of Interest in Scientific Research Related to Regulation or Litigation D. B. Resnik, “Conflicts of Interest in Scientific Research Related to Regulation or Litigation”, Journal of Philosophy Science and Law, vol. 7, 2007. Read more about Conflicts of Interest in Scientific Research Related to Regulation or LitigationLog in or register to post commentsGoogle ScholarBibTexTaggedMARCXMLRIS
Demonstrating 'Reasonable Fear' at Trial: Is It Science or Junk Science? S. L. Burns, “Demonstrating 'Reasonable Fear' at Trial: Is It Science or Junk Science?”, Human Studies: A Journal for Philosophy and the Social Sciences, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 107-131, 2008. Read more about Demonstrating 'Reasonable Fear' at Trial: Is It Science or Junk Science?Google ScholarDOIBibTexTaggedMARCXMLRIS
The Propriety of Expert Ethics Testimony in the Courtroom : A Discourse T. Orila, “The Propriety of Expert Ethics Testimony in the Courtroom : A Discourse”, Journal of Philosophy Science and Law, vol. 6, 2006. Read more about The Propriety of Expert Ethics Testimony in the Courtroom : A DiscourseLog in or register to post commentsGoogle ScholarBibTexTaggedMARCXMLRIS
Ethical Considerations of Multiple Roles in Forensic Services R. H. Woody, “Ethical Considerations of Multiple Roles in Forensic Services”, Ethics & Behavior, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 79-87, 2009. Read more about Ethical Considerations of Multiple Roles in Forensic ServicesGoogle ScholarDOIBibTexTaggedMARCXMLRIS
Expert Testimony in Psychology: Ramifications of Supreme Court Decision in Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael E. A. Youngstrom and Busch, C. Pellegrini, “Expert Testimony in Psychology: Ramifications of Supreme Court Decision in Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael”, Ethics & Behavior, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 185-193, 2000. Read more about Expert Testimony in Psychology: Ramifications of Supreme Court Decision in Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. CarmichaelLog in or register to post commentsGoogle ScholarDOIBibTexTaggedMARCXMLRIS
The Ethics of Harmful Psychiatric Research: A Faulty Effort to Defend Them N. S. Lehrman, “The Ethics of Harmful Psychiatric Research: A Faulty Effort to Defend Them”, Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality Assurance, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 283, 1997. Read more about The Ethics of Harmful Psychiatric Research: A Faulty Effort to Defend ThemGoogle ScholarDOIBibTexTaggedMARCXMLRIS
The Limits of Expertise American Sociological Association, “The Limits of Expertise”. American Sociological Association , 2009. Read more about The Limits of ExpertiseLog in or register to post commentsGoogle ScholarBibTexTaggedMARCXMLRIS
Witness to an execution: KQED sues to videotape capital punishment M. Schwerz, “Witness to an execution: KQED sues to videotape capital punishment”. Indiana University School of Journalism , 1991. Read more about Witness to an execution: KQED sues to videotape capital punishmentLog in or register to post commentsGoogle ScholarBibTexTaggedMARCXMLRIS
Affective Responses of Students Who Witness Classroom Cheating M. W. Firmin, Burger, A., and Blosser, M., “Affective Responses of Students Who Witness Classroom Cheating”, Educational Research Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 3-15, 2009. Read more about Affective Responses of Students Who Witness Classroom CheatingGoogle ScholarBibTexTaggedMARCXMLRIS