Sort by

Search results

Did you mean: experience fairness

Displaying 1 - 25 of 133 results.

Institutional Constraints on the Ethics of Expert Testimony

B. D. Sales and Simon, L., “Institutional Constraints on the Ethics of Expert Testimony”, Ethics and Behavior, vol. 3, no. 3-4, pp. 231-249, 1993.

Disentangling Daubert: An Epistemological Study in Theory and Practice

S. Haack, “Disentangling Daubert: An Epistemological Study in Theory and Practice”, Journal of Philosophy Science and Law, vol. 5, 2005.

The Evolving Role of Scientific Experts in the Courts

M. S. Frankel, “The Evolving Role of Scientific Experts in the Courts ”, Journal of Philosophy Science and Law, vol. 1, 2001.

The expert witness, the adversary system, and the voice of reason: Reconciling impartiality and advocacy

D. W. Shuman and Greenberg, S. A., “The expert witness, the adversary system, and the voice of reason: Reconciling impartiality and advocacy”, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 219-224, 2003.

Punishing Experts, or Protecting the Courts ?

L. Andrew, “Punishing Experts, or Protecting the Courts ?”, Journal of Philosophy Science and Law, vol. 5, 2005.

Daubert and the Acceptability of Legal Decisions

C. F. Cranor, “Daubert and the Acceptability of Legal Decisions”, Journal of Philosophy Science and Law, vol. 5, 2005.

Conflicts of Interest in Scientific Research Related to Regulation or Litigation

D. B. Resnik, “Conflicts of Interest in Scientific Research Related to Regulation or Litigation”, Journal of Philosophy Science and Law, vol. 7, 2007.

Demonstrating 'Reasonable Fear' at Trial: Is It Science or Junk Science?

S. L. Burns, “Demonstrating 'Reasonable Fear' at Trial: Is It Science or Junk Science?”, Human Studies: A Journal for Philosophy and the Social Sciences, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 107-131, 2008.

The Propriety of Expert Ethics Testimony in the Courtroom : A Discourse

T. Orila, “The Propriety of Expert Ethics Testimony in the Courtroom : A Discourse”, Journal of Philosophy Science and Law, vol. 6, 2006.

Ethical Considerations of Multiple Roles in Forensic Services

R. H. Woody, “Ethical Considerations of Multiple Roles in Forensic Services”, Ethics & Behavior, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 79-87, 2009.

Expert Testimony in Psychology: Ramifications of Supreme Court Decision in Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael

E. A. Youngstrom and Busch, C. Pellegrini, “Expert Testimony in Psychology: Ramifications of Supreme Court Decision in Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael”, Ethics & Behavior, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 185-193, 2000.

The Ethics of Harmful Psychiatric Research: A Faulty Effort to Defend Them

N. S. Lehrman, “The Ethics of Harmful Psychiatric Research: A Faulty Effort to Defend Them”, Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality Assurance, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 283, 1997.

The Limits of Expertise

American Sociological Association, “The Limits of Expertise”. American Sociological Association , 2009.

Witness to an execution: KQED sues to videotape capital punishment

M. Schwerz, “Witness to an execution: KQED sues to videotape capital punishment”. Indiana University School of Journalism , 1991.

Affective Responses of Students Who Witness Classroom Cheating

M. W. Firmin, Burger, A., and Blosser, M., “Affective Responses of Students Who Witness Classroom Cheating”, Educational Research Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 3-15, 2009.

Pages