Search

Enter your keywords:

Retain current filters

An Analytic Hierarchy Process Model to Apportion Co-Author Responsibility

Authors: Sheskin, Theodore J.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Secondary Title: Science and Engineering Ethics
Abstract: This paper presents a analytic hierarchy process that can be used to determine coauthor responsibility for a scientific paper describing collaborative research. The objective is to hold coauthors accountable for their individual con...
Year: 2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-006-0053-4

Biblio - KBL781 - 2009-09-14 13:31

A Proposal for a New System of Credit Allocation in Science

Authors: Resnik, David B.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Secondary Title: Science and Engineering Ethics
Abstract: This essay discusses some of the problems with current authorship practices and puts forward a proposal for a new system of credit allocation: in published works, scientists should more clearly define the responsibilities and contri...
Year: 1997
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-997-0023-5

Biblio - KBL781 - 2009-09-14 13:23

Peer Review and Controversial Research

Authors: University of Minnesota, Office of the Vice President of Research
Publication Type: Case Study
Abstract: Dr. Rolands did research and wrote a paper that challenged an established way certain work-motivation studies are performed. The two main proponents of the conventional paradigm that Rolands challenged are two well-known and prestig...
Year: 2004
URL: http://www.research.umn.edu/ethics/pdf/peerreviewcontroversialresearch.pdf

Biblio - KBL781 - 2009-10-08 11:31

Reflections on Determining Authorship Credit and Authorship order on Faculty-Student Collaborations

Authors: Kurdek, Lawrence, A. ; Fine, Mark A.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Secondary Title: American Psychologist
Abstract: Explores the process of determining authorship credit and authorship order on collaborative publications with students. The article presents hypothetical cases that describe relevant ethical issues, highlights ethical principles tha...
Year: 1993
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.48.11.1141

Biblio - KBL781 - 2009-12-03 11:10

Graduate Students and the Culture of Authorship

Authors: Oberlander, Sarah E. ; Spencer, Robert J.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Secondary Title: Ethics & Behavior
Abstract: This empirical study concerns the authorship credit decision-making processes and outcomes that occur among coauthors in cases of multiauthored publications. The 2002 American Psychological Association (APA) Ethics Code offers stand...
Year: 2006
URL: http://www.ethicslibrary.org/resources/209/
DOI: 10.1207/s15327019eb1603_3

Biblio - KBL781 - 2009-12-03 15:23

Ethical and Legal Considerations Regarding Disputed Authorship with the Use of Shared Data

Authors: Welsh, Robert K. ; Clevenger, Jeanne K. ; Reger, Mark A. ; Lareau, Craig R.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Secondary Title: Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality Assurance
Abstract: Little guidance is currently available for handling disputes between research mentors and students when working with shared data. This article analyzes how the ethical guidelines from the American Psychological Association, the Offi...
Year: 2008
DOI: 10.1080/08989620801946925

Biblio - KBL781 - 2009-09-14 13:41

Responsible Authorship Quick Guide: Detecting Common Mistakes and Considering Dilemmas in Responsible Authorship

Publication Type: Online Tutorial
Abstract: This tutorial gives a succinct overview of common mistakes made by authors when publishing their research. It includes everything from citing references to deciding on which statistic methodology to use. The tutorial is accompani...
Year: 2006
URL: http://www.niu.edu/rcrportal/publication/index.htm

Biblio - KBL781 - 2009-10-05 15:27

Conflict of Interest and Medical Publication

Authors: Reidenberg, Marcus M.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Secondary Title: Science and Engineering Ethics
Abstract: The paper discusses the ethical requirement for researchers to publish the results of some medical studies, even if the data is "negative". Since publication is an essential part of research and patients have been recruited into a s...
Year: 2002
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-002-0067-5

Biblio - KBL781 - 2009-09-14 13:23

Research Misconduct Policies of Social Science Journals and Impact Factor

Authors: Patrone, Daniel ; Peddada, Shyamal ; Resnik, David B.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Secondary Title: Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality Assurance
Abstract: In this study, the authors gathered data on the misconduct policies of social science journals and combined it with the data from a previous study on journal misconduct policies. Consistent with our earlier finding, impact factor of...
Year: 2010
DOI: 10.1080/08989621003641181

Biblio - KBL781 - 2010-09-20 16:36

Friendship v.s. Authorship

Publication Type: Case Study
Abstract: This case discusses issues of authorship in a lab or research group setting, the problems that occur when policies regarding collaborations are not in place and a faculty member's responsibility to students as a mentor....
Year: 2002
URL: http://www.onlineethics.org/Resources/Cases/friendship.aspx

Biblio - KBL781 - 2010-10-21 14:26

Timely Publication

Publication Type: Case Study
Abstract: A scenario that covers ethical issues that arise when a supervisor does not review a doctoral student's manuscript....
Year: 2006
URL: http://www.onlineethics.org/Resources/Cases/timely.aspx

Biblio - KBL781 - 2010-10-28 11:07

A Claim of Prior Discovery by a Reviewer

Publication Type: Case Study
Abstract: A scenario about a researcher who, after reviewing a journal article, recommends rejecting it because it is not novel....
Year: 2006
URL: http://www.onlineethics.org/Resources/Cases/discovery.aspx

Biblio - KBL781 - 2010-10-20 09:43

Responsibilities of Editors and Reviewers

Authors: Whitbeck, Caroline ; National Academy of Engineering, Online Ethics Center
Publication Type: Teaching Module
Abstract: This is one of the several modules designed by Caroline Whitbeck to enhance discussion and learning about research ethics and the responsibilities of editors and reviewers in scientific publication. Included in this module is backgr...
Year: 2006
URL: http://www.onlineethics.org/Resources/TeachingTools/20357/19237/publ.aspx

Biblio - KBL781 - 2011-05-20 09:53

Authorship Decision Making : An Empirical Investigation

Authors: Geelhoed, R. J. ; Fischer, A. R. ; Phillips, J. C. ; Gong, Y. ; Shpungin, E.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Secondary Title: Ethics & Behavior
Abstract: This empirical study concerns the authorship credit decision-making processes and outcomes that occur among coauthors in cases of multiauthored publications. The 2002 American Psychological Association (APA) Ethics Code offers stand...
Year: 2007
URL: http://www.ethicslibrary.org/resources/196/
DOI: 10.1080/10508420701378057

Biblio - KBL781 - 2009-12-03 15:51

A Problem Journal Submission

Authors: Robert Ladenson ; Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute of Technology
Publication Type: Case Study
Abstract: You are the editor of a scientific journal in the field of abnormal psychology. A paper recently submitted to your journal to be considered for publication reports the results of studies conducted at UCLA a decade ago involving schi...
Year: 1996
URL: http://ethics.iit.edu/EEL/Relapse.pdf

Biblio - Anonymous - 2011-08-02 13:42

A Graduate Student's Guide to Determining Authorship Credit and Authorship Order

Authors: American Psychological Association Science Student Council
Publication Type: Web Article
Abstract: This guide seeks to explain some of the details of authorship in scientific publication and offers some advice to graduate students on how to determine who should be author on a paper and negotiate where in the authorship listing th...
Year: 2006
URL: http://www.apa.org/science/leadership/students/authorship-paper.pdf

Biblio - KBL781 - 2012-11-07 11:56

Encouraging Research Collaboration Through Ethical and Fair Authorship: A Model Policy

Authors: Washburn, Jason J.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Secondary Title: Ethics & Behavior
Abstract: Realizing a comprehensive approach to evidence-based practice in psychology requires the collaboration of academic researchers and practicing clinicians. Increased collaboration is likely to contribute to the growing trend of multi-...
Year: 2008
URL: http://www.ethicslibrary.org/resources/167/
DOI: 10.1080/10508420701712917

Biblio - KBL781 - 2009-12-03 14:47