You are hereBiblio / Difference in Scoring Among Male and Female Test Takers of the Scholastic Achievement Test (SAT)
Difference in Scoring Among Male and Female Test Takers of the Scholastic Achievement Test (SAT)
|Title||Difference in Scoring Among Male and Female Test Takers of the Scholastic Achievement Test (SAT)|
|Publication Type||Case Study|
|Year of Publication||1998|
|Corporate Authors||of Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute Technology|
|Publisher||Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute of Technology|
|Keywords||Academic Ethics , Diversity , education|
For the past three decades female students have consistently received lower average grades than male students on both the verbal and math subcomponents of the Scholastic Achievement Test (SAT). In 1996 the female students' average verbal score was four points lower than the male students', and the female students' average math score was thirty five points lower. The SAT has never been shown to be a valid indicator of a student's academic performance over a four year college career, although there is a moderate positive correlation between SAT scores and students' first year grades. It is also the case, however, that for many years the average grades for female students in all subjects are consistently higher than for male students during the first year of college. Leslie R. Wolfe, President of the Center for Women Policy Studies, has recently called for the College Board, which prepares the SAT, to eliminate the gap in female and male students' scores by removing questions on which male students regularly score better than female students. Ms. Wolfe says that lower SAT scores "rob girls of scholarships they otherwise deserve." Janice Gans, a spokesperson, for the College Board, responds that Ms. Wolfe seems to be calling for a "dumbing down of the test so that girls will do better." Should Ms. Wolfe's suggestion of removing from the SAT exam questions on which male students regularly score higher than female students be adopted? If so, why? If not, why not?
Case from the February 26, 1998 Intercollegiate Ethics Bowl. Copyright Robert Ladenson, Center for the Study of Ethics at the Illinois Institute of Technology, 1998.
|URL||Click here for the document|