You are hereBiblio / U.S. Immunity from the International Criminal Court

U.S. Immunity from the International Criminal Court


By KBL781 - Posted on 10 January 2011

TitleU.S. Immunity from the International Criminal Court
Publication TypeCase Study
Year of Publication2003
AuthorsCox-White, Becky, Anestidou Lida, Connolly Peggy, Keller David R., Ladenson Robert, and Leever Martin
Pagination1 p.
PublisherAssociation for Practical and Professional Ethics
Publication Languageeng
KeywordsHUMAN rights , Legal Issues , MILITARY , MILITARY ethics , Public Policy , Social Justice
Abstract

The International Criminal Court was created to take appropriate action in the even that authorities within a nation fail to prosecute series crimes against humanity, such as atrocities during war, genocide, and other violations of human rights committed within the nation's jurisdiction. The U.S. refused to ratify the treaty setting up this court unless American troops are exempt from the ICC's jurisdiction. Critics of the U.S. position argue that the U.S.'s stance undermines the credibility of the court. However, supporters of the U.S. stance argue that agreeing to the ICC having jurisdiction over U.S. troops could result in politically motivated prosecutions of U.S.troops, diplomats, and political officials before the ICC.

Notes

Case from the 2003 APPE National Ethics Bowl Championship. Copyright, Association for Practical and Professional Ethics, 2003. http://www.indiana.edu/~appe/ethicsbowl.html

URLClick here for the document
None
Login or register to tag items
No votes yet