You are hereBiblio / A Judge's Discretion in Sentencing
A Judge's Discretion in Sentencing
| Title | A Judge's Discretion in Sentencing |
| Publication Type | Case Study |
| Year of Publication | 2004 |
| Authors | Cox-White, Becky, Althaus RuthAnn, Anestidou Lida, Connolly Peggy, Keller David R., and Leever Martin |
| Pagination | 2 p. |
| Publisher | Association for Practical and Professional Ethics |
| Publication Language | eng |
| Keywords | Criminal Justice , Law , Legal Issues |
| Abstract | In April 2003, Congress enacted the PROTECT Act, a series of legislative mandates aimed to protect children against sex crimes and pornography. This bill also directly amended federal guidelines by limiting federal judges' discretionary authority to award reduced sentences in such crimes. Critics of these amended guidelines argue that allowing a judge discretion in sentencing provides a judge with the flexibility needed to assure adequate consideration of circumstances that the federal guidelines cannot adequately capture. |
| Notes | Case from the 2004 APPE National Ethics Bowl Championship. Copyright, Association for Practical and Professional Ethics, 2004. http://www.indiana.edu/~appe/ethicsbowl.html |
| URL | Click here for the document |

