You are hereBiblio / Clinical Study Reflections: Another View

Clinical Study Reflections: Another View


By KBL781 - Posted on 04 January 2011

TitleClinical Study Reflections: Another View
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2010
AuthorsSpitzig, Patricia
JournalScience & Engineering Ethics
Volume16
Issue4
Pagination705-711
Type of ArticleArticle
Publication Languageeng
ISSN Number13533452
Accession Number55613083
KeywordsFederal , Human Research Subjects , Innovation , Institutional , MEDICINE , PUBLIC , Study , WHISTLE , Whistle-blower
Abstract

This article provides commentary to the article "Raising Suspicions with the Food and Drug Administration: Detecting Misconduct," and discusses some innovations that would help improve the minimum federal regulations for conducting clinical studies.

Notes

Spitzig, Patricia 1; Email Address: pas@public-sector.org; Affiliation: 1: The Public Sector Consortium, Cambridge, MA, USA; Source Info: Dec2010, Vol. 16 Issue 4, p705; Subject Term: INSTITUTIONAL review boards (Medicine); Subject Term: FEDERAL legislation; Subject Term: WHISTLE blowing; Subject Term: PUBLIC interest; Subject Term: MEDICINE -- Research; Author-Supplied Keyword: Federal regulations; Author-Supplied Keyword: Innovation in clinical research; Author-Supplied Keyword: Institutional Review Boards; Author-Supplied Keyword: Study subject input; Author-Supplied Keyword: Whistle-blower; NAICS/Industry Codes: 541712 Reseach and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology); Number of Pages: 7p; Document Type: Article

DOI10.1007/s11948-010-9235-1
Short TitleClinical Study Reflections: Another View
None
Login or register to tag items
No votes yet