You are hereBiblio / Eight Years after Jesse's Death, Are Human Research Subjects Any Safer?

Eight Years after Jesse's Death, Are Human Research Subjects Any Safer?


By KBL781 - Posted on 10 November 2010

TitleEight Years after Jesse's Death, Are Human Research Subjects Any Safer?
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2008
AuthorsGelsinger, Paul, and Shamoo Adil E.
JournalHastings Center Report
Volume38
Issue2
Pagination25-27
PublisherHastings Center
Publication Languageeng
ISSN Number00930334
KeywordsClinical , ESSAYS , GELSINGER , Human , Human Research Subjects , Jesse , MEDICINE , safety , United
Abstract

This essay examines whether human research is safer in the eight years following the death of Jesse Gelsinger in a gene therapy trial. The author claims that human research subjects are still at risk for exploitation and harm because of the lack of federal oversight on clinical research in the U.S. This lack of oversight has resulted in the underreporting of adverse events from clinical trials. Paul Gelsinger, Jesse's father, and the Citizens for Responsible Care and Research (CIRCARE) are lobbying for the National Human Subjects Research Act.

Notes

Hastings Center ReportAccession Number: 31509413; Gelsinger, Paul Shamoo, Adil E.; Source Info: Mar2008, Vol. 38 Issue 2, p25; Subject Term: ESSAYS; Subject Term: HUMAN experimentation in medicine; Subject Term: CLINICAL trials; Subject Term: SAFETY; Subject Term: UNITED States; People: GELSINGER, Jesse; Number of Pages: 3p; Document Type: Essay

DOI10.1353/hcr.2008.0022
None
Login or register to tag items
No votes yet