You are hereBiblio / Pay-for-Performance for Doctors (Case 10)
Pay-for-Performance for Doctors (Case 10)
| Title | Pay-for-Performance for Doctors (Case 10) |
| Publication Type | Case Study |
| Year of Publication | 2008 |
| Authors | Connolly, Peggy, Althaus RuthAnn, Bellon Christina, Brinkman Anthony, and Skipper Robert Boyd |
| Publisher | Association for Practical and Professional Ethics |
| Publication Language | eng |
| Abstract | In order to control heath care costs, some insurance companies have tried a pay-for-performance approach where physicians are payed more if or less if they fail to meet certain benchmarks, such as seeing a set number of patients a day, have 75% of women patients receive mammograms, or order 10% fewer MRI's. Experts disagree if the standards should be the actual outcomes of care, or a list of processes to be followed. Critics of the program argue that doctors may be forced to pit their own financial well-being against what is medically best for the patient. |
| Notes | Case from the 2008 Ethics Bowl National Championship. Association for Practical and Professional Ethics, 2008. http://www.indiana.edu/~appe/ethicsbowl.html |
| URL | Click here for the document |

