You are hereBiblio / Ethics Review of Social, Behavioral, and Economic Research: Where Should We Go From Here?
Ethics Review of Social, Behavioral, and Economic Research: Where Should We Go From Here?
|Title||Ethics Review of Social, Behavioral, and Economic Research: Where Should We Go From Here?|
|Publication Type||Journal Article|
|Year of Publication||2004|
|Authors||De Vries, Raymond, DeBruin Debra A., and Goodgame Andrew|
|Journal||Ethics & Behavior|
|Type of Article||Article|
|Keywords||& , -- , aspects; , Assessment; , BEHAVIORAL , boards; , Conflict , consent.; , ethical , ethics , ETHICS; , HEALTH , Informed , Institutional , interests; , LEGISLATIVE , Moral , of , oversight; , professional , research , Research; , Review , scientists; , SOCIAL|
In an effort to better understand the problems that researchers involved in social, behavioral and economics research often face when their research proposal is being reviewed by an Institutional Review Board,this article examines 3 different aspects of research ethics committees: (a) the composition of review boards; (b) the guidelines used by these boards to review these types of research; and (c) the actual deliberations of IRBs. The article concludes with recommendations for changes in the review process and with suggestions for filling the gaps in knowledge about the way IRBs work.
De Vries, Raymond 1; Email Address: firstname.lastname@example.org DeBruin, Debra A. 1 Goodgame, Andrew 2; Affiliation: 1: Center for Bioethics, University of Minnesota 2: Chico State University, California; Source Info: Oct2004, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p351; Subject Term: RESEARCH -- Moral & ethical aspects; Subject Term: BEHAVIORAL assessment; Subject Term: LEGISLATIVE oversight; Subject Term: SOCIAL scientists; Subject Term: PROFESSIONAL ethics; Subject Term: CONFLICT of interests; Author-Supplied Keyword: behavioral health research; Author-Supplied Keyword: informed consent.; Author-Supplied Keyword: institutional review boards; Author-Supplied Keyword: research ethics; Number of Pages: 18p; Illustrations: 5 graphs; Document Type: Article