Time for a change in the understanding of what constitutes text plagiarism?

TitleTime for a change in the understanding of what constitutes text plagiarism?
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2014
AuthorsHelgesson, G
JournalResearch Ethics
Volume10
Issue4
Pagination187-195
Date Published2014
Publication Languageeng
KeywordsAuthorship , Fraud , plagiarism , research , Scientific , TEXT
AbstractPlagiarism is plaguing research publications in many fields. It is problematic by being misleading about who deserves credit for scientific results, images, text or ideas, by involving scientific fraud (when results are plagiarized) and by distorting meta-analyses. However, different research traditions put different emphasis on the originality of text. Traditional rules regarding correct quotation seem to fit the humanities and many social sciences better than the natural and engineering sciences. This article suggests that we should stop applying a common standard regarding plagiarism to all research fields and instead openly acknowledge that there are differences in what aspects of a paper are important to scientific development in different research areas. More specifically, the article discusses, as a thought experiment, whether the introduction of software supporting text production for research publications in the natural and engineering sciences - thereby further reducing the importance of who created what sentences - would be unacceptable or, quite the reverse, a means to further promote scientific progress. It is concluded that there are no valid principled arguments against introducing such software support for text production in scientific papers, while there are several advantages. Correctly handled, using such software would not involve plagiarism, because it would not be misleading about who deserves credit. 
NotesHelgesson, Gert 1; Email Address: gert.helgesson@ki.se; Affiliation: 1: Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; Source Info: Dec2014, Vol. 10 Issue 4, p187; Subject Term: PLAGIARISM; Subject Term: RESEARCH -- Moral & ethical aspects; Subject Term: FRAUD in science; Subject Term: SCIENTIFIC development; Subject Term: AUTHORSHIP; Author-Supplied Keyword: plagiarism; Author-Supplied Keyword: research ethics; Author-Supplied Keyword: research traditions; Author-Supplied Keyword: text production; Number of Pages: 9p; Document Type: Article
URLhttps://ezproxy.gl.iit.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=108691325&site=ehost-live
DOI10.1177/1747016114552686

Discipline: 

Subject: 

Publication: