Metrics-Based Assessments of Research: Incentives for ‘Institutional Plagiarism’?

TitleMetrics-Based Assessments of Research: Incentives for ‘Institutional Plagiarism’?
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2013
AuthorsBerry, C
JournalScience and Engineering Ethics
Volume19
Issue2
Pagination337 - 340
Date Published6/2013
ISSN Number14715546
KeywordsAcademic Ethics , ENGINEERING , Evaluation and Assessment , plagiarism , SCIENCE , SOCIAL sciences
AbstractThe issue of plagiarism-claiming credit for work that is not one's own, rightly, continues to cause concern in the academic community. An analysis is presented that shows the effects that may arise from metrics-based assessments of research, when credit for an author's outputs (chiefly publications) is given to an institution that did not support the research but which subsequently employs the author. The incentives for what is termed here 'institutional plagiarism' are demonstrated with reference to the UK Research Assessment Exercise in which submitting units of assessment are shown in some instances to derive around twice the credit for papers produced elsewhere by new recruits, compared to papers produced 'in-house'.
DOI10.1007/s11948-012-9352-0
Short TitleSci Eng Ethics
Full Text

Discipline: 

Subject: 

Publication: