<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>8654</rec-number><ref-type>Journal Article</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Shuman, Daniel W.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Greenberg, Stuart A.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The expert witness, the adversary system, and the voice of reason: Reconciling impartiality and advocacy</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Professional Psychology: Research and Practice</style></secondary-title><short-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The expert witness, the adversary system, and the voice of reason: Reconciling impartiality and advocacy</style></short-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">advocacy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ethical</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Expert</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Expert Witness</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">impartiality</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">professional</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PSYCHOLOGISTS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PSYCHOLOGY</style></keyword></keywords><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Expert Witness</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Psychology</style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal Article</style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">grad</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2003</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">34</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">219-224</style></pages><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1939-1323</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The legal system and the profession of psychology have differing expectations that cause psychologists who serve as expert witnesses to face fundamental conflicts. The rules of evidence demand that experts assist the trier of fact, the adversary system demands that experts serve the parties who retain them, and the ethical codes and guidelines demand that experts impartially assist the court, only in their area of competence. Psychological experts are left to sort out the competing demands, as well as their potential liability, while recognizing the importance of being persuasive. </style></abstract><doi><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10.1037/0735-7028.34.3.219</style></doi><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><accession-num><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">pro-34-3-219. First Author &amp; Affiliation: Shuman, Daniel W.</style></accession-num><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Southern Methodist U, Dedman School of Law, Dallas, TX, US. Other Journal Titles: Professional Psychology. Release Date: 20060710. Publication Type: Journal, Peer Reviewed Journal. Media Covered: Print. Media Available: Electronic; Print. Document Type: Journal Article. Language: English. Major Descriptor: Advocacy; Expert Testimony; Professional Ethics; Psychologists. Classification: Professional Ethics &amp; Standards &amp; Liability (3450); Population: Human (10); . Age Group: Adulthood (18 yrs &amp; older) (300); . References Available: Y.. Issue Publication Date: Jun, 2003. Publication History: Accepted Date: Jan 10, 2003; Revised Date: Nov 22, 2002; First Submitted Date: Jun 5, 2002. Copyright: American Psychological Association. 2003.;</style></notes></record></records></xml>