<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>6974</rec-number><ref-type>Journal Article</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">McGee, Richard</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Almquist, Julka</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Keller, Jill L.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jacobsen, Steven J.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Teaching and Learning Responsible Research Conduct: Influences of Prior Experiences on Acceptance of New Ideas</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Accountability in Research: Policies &amp; Quality Assurance</style></secondary-title><short-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Teaching and Learning Responsible Research Conduct: Influences of Prior Experiences on Acceptance of New Ideas</style></short-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Evaluation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Evaluation and Assessment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EXPERIENCE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LEARNING</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MEdici</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MEDICINE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">prior</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">QUALITATIVE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SOCIAL</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">teaching</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">TRAINING</style></keyword></keywords><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Evaluation and Assessment</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Medicine</style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal Article</style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">15</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">30-62</style></pages><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08989621</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In order to see how responsible conduct of research training actually influences the thinking and behaviors of participants, interviews were done to study the reactions of Ph.D. students and postdoctoral fellows to what was taught in an RCR course. For trainees with limited prior RCR experience, or who agreed with what was taught, it was relatively easy to influence their attitudes and how they thought they would use the new information in the future. These results revealed the importance of viewing RCR training from the perspective of learning theory and how prior knowledge influences what people learn. The results also support the need for periodic rather than one-time RCR training to counter the often conflicting views and practices young scientists experience in real-life research settings. </style></abstract><doi><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10.1080/08989620701783758</style></doi><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Article</style></work-type><accession-num><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">28111432</style></accession-num><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">McGee, Richard 1; Email Address: r-mcgee@northwestern.edu; Almquist, Julka 2; Keller, Jill L. 3; Jacobsen, Steven J. 4; Affiliations: 1: Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; 2: Department of Planning, Policy, and Design, School of Social Ecology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA; 3: College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA; 4: Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA, USA; Issue Info: Jan-Mar2008, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p30; Thesaurus Term: QUALITATIVE research; Thesaurus Term: RESEARCH; Thesaurus Term: TRAINING; Subject Term: LEARNING; Subject Term: EXPERIENCE; Subject Term: SOCIAL sciences -- Methodology; Author-Supplied Keyword: learning research conduct; Author-Supplied Keyword: prior knowledge of research ethics; Author-Supplied Keyword: research ethics; Author-Supplied Keyword: research norms; Author-Supplied Keyword: teaching research conduct; Number of Pages: 33p; Illustrations: 5 Charts; Document Type: Article</style></notes></record></records></xml>