<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>6713</rec-number><ref-type>Case Study </ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Connolly, Peggy</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Althaus, Ruth Ann</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Brinkman, Anthony</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Skipper, Robert Boyd</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cox-White, Becky</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cons and Pros </style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">business</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BUSINESS ethics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Criminal Justice</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Public Policy</style></keyword></keywords><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Business Ethics</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Public Policy</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Criminal Justice</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Business</style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Case Study </style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">01/2011</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://ethics.iit.edu/EEL/Cons%20and%20Pros.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Association for Practical and Professional Ethics </style></publisher><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1 p.</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">While the United States has improved conditions in its prisons, the use of prison labor continues.  Advocates of such work programs claim that inmates who participate in such programs gain valuable skills and are more likely to function as productive members of society when they are released. Opponents of these programs point out that jobs held by convicts are taken away from the most economically hard-pressed segments of society.</style></abstract><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Case from the 2011 APPE National Ethics Bowl Championship. Copyright, Association for Practical and Professional Ethics, 2011. http://www.indiana.edu/~appe/ethicsbowl.html</style></notes></record></records></xml>