<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>6700</rec-number><ref-type>Case Study </ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cox-White, Becky</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Althaus, Ruth Ann</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anestidou, Lida</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Connolly, Peggy</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Keller, David R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Leever, Martin</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Malaria and DDT</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BIOETHICS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ENVIRONMENTAL</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ENVIRONMENTAL ethics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Environmental Sciences</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MEDICINE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PUBLIC</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Public Policy</style></keyword></keywords><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Environmental Ethics</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bioethics</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Public Policy</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Environmental Sciences</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Medicine</style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Case Study </style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2004</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://ethics.iit.edu/EEL/Malaria%20and%20DDT.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Association for Practical and Professional Ethics </style></publisher><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1 p.</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">While DDT is known to have toxic effects on both the environment and humans, it is also the most effective, cost efficient way of fighting malaria in countries in Africa. The United Nations Environmental Program is seeking to eliminate the use of DDT because of the environmental damages it causes. While wealthy countries support this ban, the ban is opposed by many poor countries where malaria is a serious problem. The countries who oppose this ban argue that they lack the scientific and technical resources to develop alternatives to DDT.</style></abstract><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Case from the 2004 APPE National Ethics Bowl Championship. Copyright, Association for Practical and Professional Ethics, 2004. http://www.indiana.edu/~appe/ethicsbowl.html</style></notes></record></records></xml>