<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>6528</rec-number><ref-type>Journal Article</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bird, Stephanie J.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Responsible Research: What is Expected?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Science &amp; Engineering Ethics</style></secondary-title><short-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Responsible Research: What is Expected?</style></short-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Benefits</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Clinical</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Conflict</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">GOOD</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">RCR</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">RESPONSIBILITY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Responsible</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">responsible conduct of research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SCIENCE</style></keyword></keywords><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Responsible Conduct of Research</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Science </style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal Article</style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">16</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">693-696</style></pages><issn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">13533452</style></issn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The author discusses how researchers, research participants, policymakers and the general public all have a different idea of what is meant by &quot;responsible research,  and well as differing expectations of the benefits of research ranging from accurate and reliable data that extend the body of knowledge, to solutions to societal concerns. Unless these differing constituencies articulate their differing views they may fail to communicate and undermine the value of research to society. </style></abstract><doi><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10.1007/s11948-010-9248-9</style></doi><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Article</style></work-type><accession-num><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">55613090</style></accession-num><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bird, Stephanie J.; Email Address: sjbird@mit.edu; Source Info: Dec2010, Vol. 16 Issue 4, p693; Subject Term: RESEARCH; Subject Term: CONFLICT of interests; Subject Term: RESPONSIBILITY; Subject Term: SCIENCE; Subject Term: CLINICAL trials; Author-Supplied Keyword: Benefits of research; Author-Supplied Keyword: Clinical research; Author-Supplied Keyword: Clinical trials; Author-Supplied Keyword: Conflict of interest; Author-Supplied Keyword: Good science; Author-Supplied Keyword: RCR; Author-Supplied Keyword: Research integrity; Author-Supplied Keyword: Responsible conduct of research; Number of Pages: 4p; Document Type: Article</style></notes></record></records></xml>