<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>5339</rec-number><ref-type>Newspaper Article</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Emanuel, Ezekiel J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Grady, Christine</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Is Longer Always Better?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hastings Center Report</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EDITORIALS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Human</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Informed</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Institutional</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MEDICINE</style></keyword></keywords><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Informed Consent</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Medicine</style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Newspaper Article</style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hastings Center</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">38</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10-11</style></pages><issn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">00930334</style></issn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The authors examine whether the institutional review board should agree and let full informed consent be waived in a randomized clinical trial. They assert that a study that seeks to empirically assess whether a more concise consent document improves research participants' understanding poses no risk, as long as the document provides information on the specific elements required by current human subjects regulations. They reveal the basis for assessing the risk of the informed consent substudy.</style></abstract><doi><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10.1353/hcr.0.0014</style></doi><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial</style></work-type><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3Accession Number: 32727108; Emanuel, Ezekiel J. Grady, Christine; Source Info: May/Jun2008, Vol. 38 Issue 3, p10; Subject Term: EDITORIALS; Subject Term: INSTITUTIONAL review boards (Medicine); Subject Term: INFORMED consent (Medical law); Subject Term: HUMAN experimentation in medicine; Subject Term: MEDICINE -- Research; NAICS/Industry Codes: 519110 News Syndicates; NAICS/Industry Codes: 541712 Reseach and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology); Number of Pages: 2p; Document Type: Editorial</style></notes></record></records></xml>