<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>5334</rec-number><ref-type>Journal Article</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Davis, Dena S.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Parental Investment Factor and the Child's Right to an Open Future</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hastings Center Report</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BIOETHICS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Essay</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MEDICINE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PREIMPLANTATION</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PRENATAL</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">REPRODUCTION</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reproductive</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">United</style></keyword></keywords><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bioethics</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Medicine</style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal Article</style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hastings Center</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">39</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">24-27</style></pages><issn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">00930334</style></issn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This essay discusses the two methods of directed procreation in the U.S., sperm sorting and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). Parents fixated on the importance of having a girl will find it hard to be open to the own interests of a child. The author says directed procreation has the alchemy to turn a hope into a virtual entitlement. Sperm sorting has the advantage of working before conception so there are no concerns about moral status. Meanwhile, PGD can be used in sex selection and desired genetic traits.</style></abstract><doi><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10.1353/hcr.0.0125</style></doi><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hastings Center ReportAccession Number: 37199131; DAVIS, DENA S.; Source Info: Mar2009, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p24; Subject Term: ESSAY (Literary form); Subject Term: REPRODUCTIVE technology; Subject Term: PREIMPLANTATION genetic diagnosis; Subject Term: PRENATAL diagnosis; Subject Term: REPRODUCTION; Subject Term: UNITED States; Number of Pages: 4p; Document Type: Essay</style></notes></record></records></xml>