<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>5259</rec-number><ref-type>Case Study </ref-type><contributors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">New Technology - Who Is the Designer?</style></title></titles><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Intellectual Property and Patents</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Civil Engineering</style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Case Study </style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1998</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.onlineethics.org/Resources/Cases/technology.aspx</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">National Academy of Engineering, Online Ethics Center </style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This case illustrates a commonly blurred area between the right to ownership of one's ideas and the right to exclude others from making, using, or selling an invention.</style></abstract><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Brian Schrag, ed., Research Ethics: Cases and Commentaries, Volume 2, Bloomington, Indiana: Association for Practical and Professional Ethics, 1998</style></notes></record></records></xml>