<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>5179</rec-number><ref-type>Case Study </ref-type><contributors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Owing to a Failure</style></title></titles><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Professional Responsibility</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Engineer/Client Relationships</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Engineering </style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Case Study </style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.onlineethics.org/Resources/Cases/Failure.aspx</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">National Academy of Engineering, Online Ethics Center </style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Norm Nash represented R&amp;M's &quot;official position&quot;: the piece of equipment is all right. However, during the course of the meeting it becomes apparent to Walt Winters that the problem has to be R&amp;M's. Should Walt say anything about this in the presence of the customer, or should he wait until after the meeting to discuss this with Norm Nash?</style></abstract></record></records></xml>