<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>5054</rec-number><ref-type>Journal Article</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Norton, Karleen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wilson, Donna M.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuing Ethics Review Practices by Canadian Research Ethics Boards</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IRB: Ethics &amp; Human Research</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EXECUTIVE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Literature</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">professional</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Review</style></keyword></keywords><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Institutional Review Boards</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Informed Consent</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Human Research Subjects</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Medicine</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Science </style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal Article</style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">30</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10-14</style></pages><issn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">01937758</style></issn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The article focuses on the significant role of research ethics boards (REBs) in reviewing the proposed research studies that evaluate the ethical and regulatory requirements governing research with humans. These include the determined risk of potential harms to research participants and weigh potential risk against research benefits. It also introduces the Tri-Council Policy Statement on Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (TCPS) which guides REBs review.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Article</style></work-type><accession-num><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">33013436</style></accession-num><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Norton, Karleen Wilson, Donna M.; Source Info: May/Jun2008, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p10; Subject Term: EXECUTIVE advisory bodies; Subject Term: PROFESSIONAL ethics; Subject Term: REVIEW committees; Subject Term: LITERATURE reviews; Subject Term: RESEARCH; NAICS/Industry Codes: 921110 Executive Offices; Number of Pages: 5p; Document Type: Article</style></notes></record></records></xml>