<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>4950</rec-number><ref-type>Journal Article</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kumar, Malhar N.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A Theoretical Comparison of the Models of Prevention of Research Misconduct</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Accountability in Research: Policies &amp; Quality Assurance</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">employee</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ENGINEERING</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MALPRACTICE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MEDICINE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Misconduct</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">models</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Organizational</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Prevention</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Responsible</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SCIENCE</style></keyword></keywords><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Misconduct</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Science </style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Engineering </style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Medicine</style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal Article</style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">17</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">51-66</style></pages><issn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08989621</style></issn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The author cites the need for research administrators to focus on the prevention  rather than the detection of research misconduct, and describes six models of prevention in a way that allows institutions examine the advantages and disadvantages of each, and to chose an appropriate model for them.</style></abstract><doi><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10.1080/08989621003641132</style></doi><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Article</style></work-type><accession-num><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">48675407</style></accession-num><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kumar, Malhar N. 1; Email Address: docmnkumar@gmail.com; Affiliations: 1: OSMAT Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.; Issue Info: Mar2010, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p51; Thesaurus Term: EMPLOYEE rules; Thesaurus Term: ORGANIZATIONAL behavior; Thesaurus Term: MALPRACTICE; Subject Term: MISCONDUCT in office; Subject Term: RESPONSIBLE persons; Author-Supplied Keyword: models of prevention; Author-Supplied Keyword: prevention of research misconduct; Author-Supplied Keyword: research ethics; Author-Supplied Keyword: research misconduct investigation; Number of Pages: 16p; Document Type: Article</style></notes></record></records></xml>