<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>4494</rec-number><ref-type>Journal Article</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wueste, Daniel E.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Realist's Challenge in Professional Ethics: Taking Some Cues from Legal Philosophy</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Professional Ethics: A Multidisciplinary Journal</style></secondary-title></titles><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Professional Ethics</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Philosophy</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Law</style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal Article</style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1999</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-22</style></pages><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1063-6579</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A strain of realism in practical and professional ethics similar to what is called legal realism in jurisprudence is identified and explained. Drawing on the work of legal philosophers Ronald Dworkin and Randy Barnett, a response to the realist's challenge is developed and illustrated. The response relies on multiple modes of analysis--consequentialist, rights-based deontological, and role-based institutional. Because there must be a way to deal with hard cases that involve irresolvable conflict between these 'modes' of analysis, a presumption in favor of the latter is part of the recommended strategy.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal Article</style></work-type><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cover Date: Summer 1999.Source Info: 7(2), 3-22. Language: English. Journal Announcement: 35-1. Subject: ETHICS; LEGAL; PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; REALISM; SCEPTICISM. Update Code: 20100311.</style></notes></record></records></xml>