<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>4423</rec-number><ref-type>Journal Article</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Koehn, Daryl</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">What Is Practical Judgement?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Professional Ethics: A Multidisciplinary Journal</style></secondary-title></titles><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ethical Decision-Making</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Philosophy</style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal Article</style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2000</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-18</style></pages><issn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1063-6579</style></issn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This paper examines what it means to claim, as Aristotle does, that, in cases of practical judgment, the decision rests with perception. The author argues that practical judgment is, at the very least, crucially dependent upon perception and even might be said to be identical with it. Utilitarians and Kantians, therefore, err badly when they take judgment to be a matter of subsuming a particular case under a rule. It is far better to think of judgment along 'pragmatic' lines--i.e., as a response to a highly particular problem, a response that reflects and develops character, that calls for imaginative and creative insight, that evolves over time in light of experience and that needs to be considered by a community of inquirers.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3-4</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal Article</style></work-type><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cover Date: FALL-Winter 2000.Source Info: 8(3-4), 3-18. Language: English. Journal Announcement: 37-1. Subject: ETHICS; JUDGMENT; PRACTICAL; UTILITARIANISM. Subject Person: KANT, IMMANUEL. Update Code: 20100311.</style></notes></record></records></xml>