<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>4325</rec-number><ref-type>Journal Article</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wynne, Brian</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science – Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Community Genetics</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Culture</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mistrust</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PUBLIC</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SCIENCE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">trust</style></keyword></keywords><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Public Engagement and Science</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Science </style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal Article</style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">211-220</style></pages><issn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14222795</style></issn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This paper analyses the recent widespread moves to ‘restore’ public trust in science by developing an avowedly two-way, public dialogue with science initiatives. The author argues that this move is a symptom of a continuing failure of scientific and policy institutions to place their own science-policy institutional culture into the frame of dialogue, and that this might be a contributory cause of the public mistrust problem. </style></abstract><doi><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10.1159/000092659</style></doi><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Article</style></work-type><accession-num><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21130162</style></accession-num><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wynne, Brian 1; Email Address: b.wynne@lancaster.ac.uk; Affiliation: 1: ESRC Centre for Economic and Social Aspects of Genomics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK; Source Info: 2006, Vol. 9 Issue 3, p211; Subject Term: SCIENCE; Subject Term: TRUST; Subject Term: SCIENCE &amp; state; Subject Term: PUBLIC welfare; Subject Term: CULTURE; Author-Supplied Keyword: Mistrust of science; Author-Supplied Keyword: Public deficit models; Author-Supplied Keyword: Science policy; NAICS/Industry Codes: 923130 Administration of Human Resource Programs (except Education, Public Health, and Veterans' Affairs Programs); NAICS/Industry Codes: 624230 Emergency and Other Relief Services; NAICS/Industry Codes: 525120 Health and Welfare Funds; NAICS/Industry Codes: 624190 Other Individual and Family Services; Number of Pages: 10p; Illustrations: 2 Charts; Document Type: Article</style></notes></record></records></xml>