<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>4239</rec-number><ref-type>Journal Article</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Boyd, EA</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bero, LA</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Assessing faculty financial relationships with industry: A case study.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association </style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Biomedical</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Biomedical Research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">California</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Conflict</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Conflict of Interest</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Faculty</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Faculty, Medical</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Financial</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Financial Management</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Government</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Government Regulation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">industry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Medical</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">policy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Policy Making</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">private</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PRIVATE sector</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Research Support as Topic</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Universities</style></keyword></keywords><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Conflict of Interest</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Science </style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Medicine</style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal Article</style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2000</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nov</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=11056592</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">284</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2209-14</style></pages><issn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">0098-7484</style></issn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In order to assess the extent to which faculty researchers have personal financial relationships with the sponsors of their research,the authors of this study looked at conflict of interest disclosure forms of facuty at the University of California of San Fransisco and found that from 1980 to 1999, almost 7.6% of faculty investigators reported personal financial ties with sponsors of their research. Throughout the study period, 34% of disclosed relationships involved paid speaking engagements, 33% involved consulting agreements between researcher and sponsor, and 32% involved the investigator holding a position on a scientific advisory board or board of directors. The authors examines suggestions made by the advisory panel on perceived conflicts of interest during this period, and recommends that guidelines for what constitutes a conflict and how the conflict should be managed are needed if researchers are to have consistent standards of behavior among institutions</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">17</style></issue><accession-num><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11056592</style></accession-num></record></records></xml>