<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>4212</rec-number><ref-type>Journal Article</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kottow, Miguel</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The battering of informed consent.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Medical Ethics </style></secondary-title></titles><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Human Research Subjects</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Science </style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Medicine</style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal Article</style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2004</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dec</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">30</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">565-9</style></pages><issn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">0306-6800</style></issn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The author argues that thought autonomy has been hailed as the foremost principle of bioethics, the voluntary participation of research participants is being subject to frequent restrictions, often in the form of paternalism by doctors. The author discusses why this is a major problem in clinical research, and why bioethics should insist on reinforcing autonomy in these settings. </style></abstract><doi><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10.1136/jme.2003.002949</style></doi><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue></record></records></xml>