<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>360</rec-number><ref-type>Journal Article</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Funk, Carolyn L.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barrett, Kirsten A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Macrina, Francis L.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Authorship and Publication Practices: Evaluation of the Effect of Responsible Conduct of Research Instruction to Postdoctoral Trainees</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Accountability in Research: Policies &amp; Quality Assurance</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">and</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Authorship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">conduct</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Curricula</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">education</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">F32</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">fellows</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">guidelines</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">instruction</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NIH</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">of</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">POSTDOCTORAL</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">programs</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Publication</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PUBLICATIONS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">RCR</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Responsible</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">–</style></keyword></keywords><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Science </style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Engineering </style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Authorship</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">RESEARCH POSTDOCTORAL programs AUTHORSHIP PUBLICATIONS EDUCATION – Curricula authorship and publication authorship guidelines NIH F32 postdoctoral fellows RCR responsible conduct of research instruction</style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal Article</style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">grad</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2007</style></year></dates><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">269-305</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article gives the results of a survey whose main goal was to  to test the effectiveness of responsible conduct of research (RCR) education for post-graduates in the areas of authorship and publication practices. Overall the responses of the subjects suggested a clear awareness of standards and practices in publication. The survey did not suggest, however, that  RCR education isignificantly increased the level of ethically appropriate behavioral responses, or increased attention to ethical guidelines about authorship and publication practices. The authors argue that the results do not argue against continuing RCR education, but merely for the need to carefully articulate course goals and objectives with attention to the background and experience of the student audience when developing RCR curricula. </style></abstract><doi><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10.1080/08989620701670187</style></doi><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Funk, Carolyn L. 1; Barrett, Kirsten A. 1; Macrina, Francis L. 1; Email Address: macrina@vcu.edu; Affiliations: 1: Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA; Issue Info: Oct-Dec2007, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p269; Thesaurus Term: RESEARCH; Subject Term: POSTDOCTORAL programs; Subject Term: AUTHORSHIP; Subject Term: PUBLICATIONS; Subject Term: EDUCATION – Curricula; Author-Supplied Keyword: authorship and publication; Author-Supplied Keyword: authorship guidelines; Author-Supplied Keyword: NIH F32 postdoctoral fellows; Author-Supplied Keyword: RCR; Author-Supplied Keyword: responsible conduct of research instruction; Number of Pages: 37p; Illustrations: 7 charts, 2 graphs; Document Type: Article</style></notes></record></records></xml>