<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>3190</rec-number><ref-type>Case Study </ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Connolly, Peggy</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Althaus, Ruth Ann</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Brinkman, Anthony</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Robert Ladenson</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Skipper, Robert Boyd</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">For Bitter or Worse </style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bowl</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Case</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ethics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Study</style></keyword></keywords><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Legal Issues</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Law</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ethics Bowl Case Study</style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Case Study </style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://ethics.iit.edu/EEL/For%20Bitter%20or%20Worse.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Association for Practical and Professional Ethics </style></publisher><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">New York State does not grant no-fault divorces. In New York there are only four sanctioned grounds for divorce: cruel and inhuman treatment, adultery, abandonment for one year, and three years imprisonment. While many advocacy groups are fighting for a change, the New York City chapter of the National Organization opposes no-fault divorces. NYC-NOW regards the legal power to deny a divorce as the only significant leverage for many women in a system of divorce litigation that, in NYC-NOW’s estimation, is weighted heavily in unfair ways against the economic interests of women.</style></abstract><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Case Study prepared for the Association for Practical and Professional Ethics Intercollegiate Ethics Bowl National Championship, 2010</style></notes></record></records></xml>