<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>2842</rec-number><ref-type>Journal Article</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zucker, Robert S.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A Peer Review How-to</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Science </style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Authorship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SCIENCE</style></keyword></keywords><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Authorship</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Science </style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal Article</style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">01/2008</style></date></pub-dates></dates><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">32</style></section><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">319</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1/2</style></pages><issn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">00368075</style></issn><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The article presents the author's suggestions for reviewers related to effective article reviewing. It is suggested that a reviewer should be prompt and thorough, and should avoid invective and sharp language. Furthermore, it is suggested that reviewers should take into consideration all of the journal's goals and requirements. It is stated that, reviewer should keep aside his scientific prejudices while reviewing. The author suggests not to reject a manuscript simply because its ideas are not original.</style></abstract><doi><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10.1126/science.319.5859.32c</style></doi><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5859</style></issue></record></records></xml>