<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>2292</rec-number><ref-type>Case Study </ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">National Academy of Engineering, Online Ethics Center</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">National Society of Professional Engineers, Board of Ethical Review</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Contingency Payment for Industrian Design </style></title></titles><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Engineering </style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bribery and Extortion </style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Case Study </style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://onlineethics.org/cms/14304.aspx</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">National Academy of Engineering, Online Ethics Center </style></publisher><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Payment for work on a contingency or commission basis is considered by some to undermine the professional standing of engineers, and, in some circumstances, to create a conflict of interest. Others view it as creating an incentive for an engineer to deliver the best services of which she is capable. Includes references to the NSPE Code of Ethics, and a link to the original case brought before NSPE's Board of Ethical Review.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>