<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>2279</rec-number><ref-type>Case Study </ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">National Academy of Engineering, Online Ethics Center</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">National Academy of Engineering, Online Ethics Center</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">National Society of Professional Engineers, Board of Ethical Review</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Contribution to Public Works Promotion Committee </style></title></titles><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Engineering </style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bribery and Extortion </style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Case Study </style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://onlineethics.org/cms/14291.aspx</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">National Academy of Engineering, Online Ethics Center </style></publisher><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A promotion committee is organized to finance a variety of public works projects by issuing bonds to the public. They don't know, however, if they should allow engineering firms to contribute funds to the promotion fund. Includes references to the NSPE Code of Ethics, and a link to the original case brought before NSPE's Board of Ethical Review.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>