<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>1937</rec-number><ref-type>Journal Article</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wilson, Kenneth</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Schreier, Alan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Griffin, Angel</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Resnik, David B.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Research Records and the Resolution of Misconduct Allegations at Research Universities</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Accountability in Research: Policies &amp; Quality Assurance</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&amp;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">--</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">complaining;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">COMPLAINTS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EMPIRICAL</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ETHICS;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">information</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">institutes;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">integrity;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">investigations;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">keeping</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Management;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Misconduct</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Policy;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">record</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">RECORDS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Research;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">retrieval</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">storage</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">systems;</style></keyword></keywords><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Science </style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Engineering </style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Data Management</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">INFORMATION storage & retrieval systems; RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL research; RECORDS -- Management; RESEARCH institutes; COMPLAINTS & complaining; ethics; misconduct investigations; policy; research integrity; research record keeping</style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal Article</style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2007</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">57-71</style></pages><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08989621</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In order to gain a better idea about the the frequency and kinds of problems that occur in the area of recording keeping in scientific research, the authors interviewed  Research Integrity Officers (RIOs) at 90 major research universities and conducted focus groups with active research faculty. The RIOs reported problems with research records in 38% of the 553 investigations they conducted. The results of the survey point to the need to more attention to be paid to the importance of accurate record keeping in responsible conduct of research education programs. </style></abstract><doi><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10.1080/08989620601126017</style></doi><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><accession-num><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">23547837</style></accession-num><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">WILSON, KENNETH 1; Email Address: wilsonk@ecu.edu; SCHREIER, ALAN 1; GRIFFIN, ANGEL 2; RESNIK, DAVID 3; Affiliations: 1: Department of Sociology and the Division of Research and Graduate Studies, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA; 2: RTI—International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA; 3: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA; Issue Info: Jan2007, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p57; Thesaurus Term: INFORMATION storage &amp; retrieval systems; Thesaurus Term: RESEARCH; Thesaurus Term: EMPIRICAL research; Thesaurus Term: RECORDS -- Management; Thesaurus Term: RESEARCH institutes; Subject Term: COMPLAINTS &amp; complaining; Author-Supplied Keyword: ethics; Author-Supplied Keyword: misconduct investigations; Author-Supplied Keyword: policy; Author-Supplied Keyword: research integrity; Author-Supplied Keyword: research record keeping; Number of Pages: 15p; Illustrations: 2 charts, 1 graph; Document Type: Article</style></notes></record></records></xml>