<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>1727</rec-number><ref-type>Journal Article</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sadler, Brook Jenkins</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Wrongs of Plagiarism: Ten Quick Arguments</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Teaching Philosophy</style></secondary-title></titles><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Education</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Plagiarism</style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal Article</style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2007</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">30</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">283-291</style></pages><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">0145-5788</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article offers ten arguments to demonstrate why student plagiarism is unethical. In sum, plagiarism may be theft; involve deception that treats professors as a mere means; violate the trust upon which the professor-student relationship depends; be unfair to other students in more than one way; diminish the student's education; indulge vices such as indolence and cowardice; foreclose access to the internal goods of the discipline; diminish the value of a university degree; undercut creative self-expression and acceptance of epistemic limitations; and undermine the vital interpersonal component of higher education. Plagiarism warrants severe penalties that effectively combat the student's presumptive competitive strategy for individual success.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cover Date: September 2007.Source Info: 30(3), 283-291. Language: English. Journal Announcement: 42-1. Subject: EDUCATION; ETHICS; PLAGIARISM; TEACHING. Update Code: 20090226.</style></notes></record></records></xml>