<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>1361</rec-number><ref-type>Journal Article</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dresser, R</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Standards for animal research: looking at the middle.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of  Medical Philosophy</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ANIMAL</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">animals</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Animals,</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Animals;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Assessment;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">care</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Committees;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Control</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Control,</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ethical</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ETHICS;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Experimentation;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Formal;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Government</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Humans;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Laboratory;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Psychological</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Regulation;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">RISK</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SOCIAL</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stress</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stress,</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Theory;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Welfare;</style></keyword></keywords><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Science </style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Medicine</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Animal Research Subjects</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Animal Care Committees; Animal Experimentation; Animal Welfare; Animals; Animals</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Laboratory; Ethical Theory; Ethics; Government Regulation; Humans; Risk Assessment; Social Control</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Formal; Stress</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Psychological</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Animal Care Committees; Animal Experimentation; Animal Welfare; Animals; Animals</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Laboratory; Ethical Theory; Ethics; Government Regulation; Humans; Risk Assessment; Social Control</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Formal; Stress</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Psychological</style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal Article</style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1988</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">May</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">13</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">123-43</style></pages><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">0360-5310</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Much of the public debate over laboratory animal use has focused on either the scientist's demand for absolute freedom of inquiry, or the abolitionist's demand for an end to animal use in science. Yet many recent proposals for reform seek instead to balance the interests of laboratory animals in avoiding harm against the interests of research beneficiaries in continued animal use. This essay is an analysis of the intermediate reform positions and their underlying ethical principles.</style></abstract><doi><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10.1093/jmp/13.2.123 </style></doi><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><accession-num><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3047297</style></accession-num></record></records></xml>