<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><rec-number>1199</rec-number><ref-type>Journal Article</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Appelbaum, PS</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Roth, LH</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lidz, CW</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Benson, P</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Winslade, William J.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hastings Cent Report</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">as</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Clinical</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Comprehension;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Consent;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Control</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Disclosure;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Disorders;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Double-Blind</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">education</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Experimentation;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Groups;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Human</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Humans;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ill</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Informed</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mental</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mentally</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Method;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nontherapeutic</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">patient</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Persons;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Research;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">RISK</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Subjects;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Topic;</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">trials</style></keyword></keywords><taxonomies><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Medicine</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Human Research Subjects</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Informed Consent</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Clinical Trials as Topic; Comprehension; Control Groups; Disclosure; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Informed Consent; Mental Disorders; Mentally Ill Persons; Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation; Patient Education as Topic; Research; Research Subjects; Risk</style></taxonomy><taxonomy><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Clinical Trials as Topic; Comprehension; Control Groups; Disclosure; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Informed Consent; Mental Disorders; Mentally Ill Persons; Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation; Patient Education as Topic; Research; Research Subjects; Risk</style></taxonomy></taxonomies><pubtype><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal Article</style></pubtype><audience-level><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ug</style></audience-level><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1987</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Apr</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://k30.im.wustl.edu/ethics/week3/Applebaum_therapeutic_misconception.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">17</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">20-4</style></pages><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">0093-0334</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The author discusses some of the ethical issues that arise in clinical trials when a randomized, double-blind trial is being run for general knowledge about the treatments, but human participants believe they will personally benefit from the treatment. The article discusses the importance of study protocols, informed consent, and the tough role doctors face in regard to their role as a doctor to their patient, and their role as a researcher. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><accession-num><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3294743</style></accession-num></record></records></xml>