You are hereBiblio / From Baltimore to Bell Labs: Reflections on Two Decades of Debate about Scientific Misconduct
From Baltimore to Bell Labs: Reflections on Two Decades of Debate about Scientific Misconduct
| Title | From Baltimore to Bell Labs: Reflections on Two Decades of Debate about Scientific Misconduct |
| Publication Type | Journal Article |
| Year of Publication | 2003 |
| Authors | Resnik, David B. |
| Journal | Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality Assurance |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pagination | 123 |
| Publication Language | eng |
| ISBN Number | 08989621 |
| Accession Number | 9930577 |
| Keywords | in , Misconduct , office; , States , United |
| Abstract | In light of a decade of scientific misconduct cases, this essay proposes a new definition of scientific "misconduct," which is broader than the definition recently adopted by the U.S. government. According to the proposed definition, misconduct is a serious and intentional violation of accepted scientific practices, commonsense ethical norms, or research regulations in proposing, designing, conducting, reviewing, or reporting research. |
| Notes | Resnik, David; Issue Info: Apr2003, Vol. 10 Issue 2, p123; Subject Term: MISCONDUCT in office; Subject: UNITED States; Number of Pages: 13p; Document Type: Article |
| DOI | 10.1080/08989620300508 |
Tags
