You are hereBiblio

Biblio

Filters: Author is van Rooyen, S.  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
W
What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal?, Black, N., van Rooyen S., Godlee Fiona, Smith R., and Evans S. , JAMA, 07/1998, Volume 280, Issue 3, p.231-3, (1998) Abstract
E
Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial, van Rooyen, S., Godlee Fiona, Evans S., Black N., and Smith R. , British Medical Journal, JAN 2 1999, p.23-27, (1999) Abstract
Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review, van Rooyen, S., Godlee Fiona, Evans S., Smith R., and Black N. , JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association , OCT 1999, Volume 280, Issue 3, p.234-237, (1998) Abstract

OEC

Ethics Core

Ethics News

Science Insider

Cell Investigating Breakthrough Stem Cell Paper
Italian Parliament Orders Clinical Trial of Controversial Stem Cell Treatment

Retraction Watch

Cell reviewing allegations of image reuse in human embryonic stem cell cloning paper