You are hereBiblio

Biblio

Filters: Author is Weber, EJ  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
trials
Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting, Callaham, ML, Wears RL, Weber EJ, Barton C., and Young G. , Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, JUL 15 1998, p.254-257, (1998) Abstract
scientific integrity
Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting, Callaham, ML, Wears RL, Weber EJ, Barton C., and Young G. , Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, JUL 15 1998, p.254-257, (1998) Abstract
SCIENCE
Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting, Callaham, ML, Wears RL, Weber EJ, Barton C., and Young G. , Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, JUL 15 1998, p.254-257, (1998) Abstract
research
Author perception of peer review: impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction., Weber, EJ, Katz PP, Waeckerle JF, and Callaham ML , JAMA : Journal of the American Medical Association , J06/2002, Volume 287, Issue 21, p.2790-3, (2002) Abstract
Quality Control
Author perception of peer review: impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction., Weber, EJ, Katz PP, Waeckerle JF, and Callaham ML , JAMA : Journal of the American Medical Association , J06/2002, Volume 287, Issue 21, p.2790-3, (2002) Abstract
quality
Author perception of peer review: impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction., Weber, EJ, Katz PP, Waeckerle JF, and Callaham ML , JAMA : Journal of the American Medical Association , J06/2002, Volume 287, Issue 21, p.2790-3, (2002) Abstract
Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting, Callaham, ML, Wears RL, Weber EJ, Barton C., and Young G. , Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, JUL 15 1998, p.254-257, (1998) Abstract
Publication
Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting, Callaham, ML, Wears RL, Weber EJ, Barton C., and Young G. , Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, JUL 15 1998, p.254-257, (1998) Abstract
Personal Satisfaction
Author perception of peer review: impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction., Weber, EJ, Katz PP, Waeckerle JF, and Callaham ML , JAMA : Journal of the American Medical Association , J06/2002, Volume 287, Issue 21, p.2790-3, (2002) Abstract
personal
Author perception of peer review: impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction., Weber, EJ, Katz PP, Waeckerle JF, and Callaham ML , JAMA : Journal of the American Medical Association , J06/2002, Volume 287, Issue 21, p.2790-3, (2002) Abstract
Peer Review, Research
Author perception of peer review: impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction., Weber, EJ, Katz PP, Waeckerle JF, and Callaham ML , JAMA : Journal of the American Medical Association , J06/2002, Volume 287, Issue 21, p.2790-3, (2002) Abstract
Peer
Author perception of peer review: impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction., Weber, EJ, Katz PP, Waeckerle JF, and Callaham ML , JAMA : Journal of the American Medical Association , J06/2002, Volume 287, Issue 21, p.2790-3, (2002) Abstract
MEDICINE
Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting, Callaham, ML, Wears RL, Weber EJ, Barton C., and Young G. , Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, JUL 15 1998, p.254-257, (1998) Abstract
FATE
Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting, Callaham, ML, Wears RL, Weber EJ, Barton C., and Young G. , Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, JUL 15 1998, p.254-257, (1998) Abstract
data management
Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting, Callaham, ML, Wears RL, Weber EJ, Barton C., and Young G. , Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, JUL 15 1998, p.254-257, (1998) Abstract
Data Collection
Author perception of peer review: impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction., Weber, EJ, Katz PP, Waeckerle JF, and Callaham ML , JAMA : Journal of the American Medical Association , J06/2002, Volume 287, Issue 21, p.2790-3, (2002) Abstract
Data
Author perception of peer review: impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction., Weber, EJ, Katz PP, Waeckerle JF, and Callaham ML , JAMA : Journal of the American Medical Association , J06/2002, Volume 287, Issue 21, p.2790-3, (2002) Abstract
Clinical
Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting, Callaham, ML, Wears RL, Weber EJ, Barton C., and Young G. , Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, JUL 15 1998, p.254-257, (1998) Abstract
Authorship
Author perception of peer review: impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction., Weber, EJ, Katz PP, Waeckerle JF, and Callaham ML , JAMA : Journal of the American Medical Association , J06/2002, Volume 287, Issue 21, p.2790-3, (2002) Abstract

OEC

Ethics Core

Ethics News

Retraction Watch

A retraction with “serious consequences to wheat production”
Not your data: Nursing paper retracted for misuse of findings
“Technical but fundamental errors” lead to retraction of brain tumor paper