Search

You are hereBiblio

Biblio

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z   [Show ALL]
T
Nanoethics and the Breaching of Boundaries: A Heuristic for Going from Encouragement to a Fuller Integration of Ethical, Legal and Social Issues and Science, Tuma, Julio R. , Science and Engineering Ethics, 12/2011, Volume 17, Issue 4, p.761 - 767, (2011) Abstract
S
On Identifying Plausibility and Deliberative Public Policy, Schomberg, René , Science and Engineering Ethics, 12/2011, Volume 17, Issue 4, p.739 - 742, (2011) Abstract
O
Questioning ‘Participation’: A Critical Appraisal of its Conceptualization in a Flemish Participatory Technology Assessment, Oudheusden, Michiel , Science and Engineering Ethics, 12/2011, Volume 17, Issue 4, p.673 - 690, (2011) Abstract
M
Nanotechnology, governance, and public deliberation : What role for the social sciences?, Macnaghten, Phil, Kearnes Matthew B., and Wynne Brian , Science Communication, December 2005, Volume 2, p.268-291, (2005) Abstract
L
Technologies of Democracy: Experiments and Demonstrations, Laurent, Brice , Science and Engineering Ethics, 12/2011, Volume 17, Issue 4, p.649 - 666, (2011) Abstract
Mutable Matter: Using Sensory Methods in Public Engagement with Nanotechnology, Last, Angela , Leonardo, 04/2012, Volume 45, Issue 2, p.132 - 139, (2012) Abstract
K
Constructing Productive Engagement: Pre-engagement Tools for Emerging Technologies, Kulve, Haico Te, and Rip Arie , Science and Engineering Ethics, 12/2011, Volume 17, Issue 4, p.699 - 714, (2011) Abstract
Social Perspectives on Nanoscale Sciences and Technologies, Kjolberg, Kamilla Lein, and Wickson Fern , Singapore , (2010) Abstract
J
A timely harvest, Joly, Pierre-Benoit, and Rip Arie , Nature, 11/2007, Volume 450, Issue 7167, p.174 - 174, (2007) Abstract
I
The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the 'New' Scientific Governance, Irwin, A. , Social Studies of Science, 04/2006, Volume 36, Issue 2, p.299 - 320, (2006) Abstract
H
Community Participation in Australian Science and Technology Policy: The Case of Nanotechnology, Harwood, Jeff, and Schibeci Renato , Prometheus, 06/2008, Volume 26, Issue 2, p.153 - 163, (2008) Abstract
Public Deliberation and Governance: Engaging with Science and Technology in Contemporary Europe, Hagendijk, Rob, and Irwin Alan , Minerva, 06/2006, Volume 44, Issue 2, p.167 - 184, (2006) Abstract
G
Participating Despite Questions: Toward a More Confident Participatory Technology Assessment : Commentary on 'Questioning 'Participation': A Critical Appraisal of its Conceptualization in a Flemish Participatory Technology Assessment", Guston, David H. , Science and Engineering Ethics, 12/2011, Volume 17, Issue 4, p.691 - 697, (2011) Abstract
Public engagement and nanotechnology in the UK: restoring trust or building robustness?, Groves, C. , Science and Public Policy, 12/2011, Volume 38, Issue 10, p.783 - 793, (2011) Abstract
F
Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance From Within, Fisher, E., Mahajan R. L., and Mitcham C. , Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 12/2006, Volume 26, Issue 6, p.485 - 496, (2006) Abstract
Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance From Within, Fisher, E., Mahajan R. L., and Mitcham C. , Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 12/2006, Volume 26, Issue 6, p.485 - 496, (2006) Abstract
Å
Trust in Nanotechnology? On Trust as Analytical Tool in Social Research on Emerging Technologies, Åm, Trond Grønli , NanoEthics, 4/2011, Volume 5, Issue 1, p.15 - 28, (2011) Abstract
Trust as Glue in Nanotechnology Governance Networks, Åm, Heidrun , NanoEthics, 4/2011, Volume 5, Issue 1, p.115 - 128, (2011) Abstract

Navigation

Further Resources