<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>12</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ball, Phillip</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Damning all nanomaterials would be damned silly</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nature News Online</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">October 16, 2006</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.nature.com/news/2006/061016/full/061016-6.html</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nature</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Author Philip Ball criticizes the Canadian environmental group, the ETC Group, for holding a competition to design a warning symbol, similar to symbols used to warn of biological or radiation hazards that would be used to identify the presence of nanomaterials in a product. While there is significant reason to push for better regulation and toxicology testing of nanomaterials, Ball warns that labeling all nanoparticles as potentially hazardous is neither useful more sensible.</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Online Column</style></work-type></record></records></xml>