<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Of mice and men</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nature Nanotechnology</style></secondary-title><short-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nature Nanotech</style></short-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7/2009</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">395 - 395</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Discusses the need for a systematic way to formulate and tackle problems in nanotoxicology, and to compare and combine the results of individual studies. The authors discuss the many different factors that can vary from study to study in the field, and  the need for the pace of nanotoxicology research to increase in a systematic way so that priorities can be set based on what we have learned so far, and good models so that design experiments resemble the real conditions and settings of exposure to nanomaterials that happen in the workplace and in the use of consumer products. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></issue></record></records></xml>