<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>27</ref-type><contributors><translated-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Swiss Re Centre for Global Dialogue</style></author></translated-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%"> Nanotechnology: small size - large impact?</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2004</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://media.cgd.swissre.com/documents/nanotechnology_report.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Swiss Re Centre for Global Dialogue </style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ruschlikon, Switzerland </style></pub-location><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">70 p.</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">English </style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Report from a conference that brought together various stakeholders for a cross-disciplinary discussion on risk analysis, risk management, and options for acceptable risk transfer. The key findings from the discussion were that standardizing nomenclature and standards is a major priority, that more risk research is urgently needed to lay a objective basis for discussion about nanotechnology, and that stakeholders need to find a common ground to benefit from that exchange.  </style></abstract></record></records></xml>