<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>19</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Uldrich, Jack</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nanotech needs a hard sell, plus education </style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Scientist </style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2004</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2004</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/14917/</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">18</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">English </style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Author discusses the letter published on July 11, 2004 in the British newspaper, The Independent, by Prince Charles that questioned if nanotechnology could someday lead to adverse consequences like the thalidomide disaster of the 1950s and 60s. Instead of dismissing such fears, the author urges scientists to begin educating the public about the potential benefits of nanotechnology. The article also urges the scientific community to accept that many of the concerns the public has are legitimate, and to work towards finding an answer for these concerns.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">16</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial </style></work-type></record></records></xml>